When discussing the situation involving Sukihana and YK Osiris, it is crucial to approach it with logical reasoning rather than purely emotional reactions. It is important to observe both sides without favoring one over the other. Regardless of the sexually explicit nature of Sukihana's behavior, it does not justify or excuse Osiris invading her body and personal space, which constitutes sexual assault and rape, regardless of any previous moments of prior flirtation. It is crucial to confront this fact.
While we acknowledge the unwarranted nature of rape and similar acts, we should also examine the triggers behind Osiris's low-vibration actions towards Sukihana, who he likely objectifies as a sexual desire. It is possible that colorism played a significant role in his bold disregard for her autonomy and rejection. This observation does not excuse his behavior, but it highlights the necessity of critical representation and understanding the underlying factors at play.
Sukihana's brand predominantly revolves around sex and degradation. Yes or no? Simultaneously, Osiris represents an immature male operating within his base nature, ready to exert pressure. These are the facts. It is understandable that people may feel upset, but it is important to recognize that many women experience sexual abuse without any provocation. Therefore, we must be critical of the individuals we promote in the media and support, as they can perpetuate negative energy within our culture.
While discussing the importance of the "Protecting Black Women" movement, we must prioritize our own protection. Sukihana willingly engages in degrading acts, such as being walked on a dog collar and expressing preferences for being urinated on and having her mouth spat in. It is important to realize that we, as women, should not rely on men to come to our rescue if we are not willing to promote self-respect even at a minimum level. What did Lauren say again? But no for real, let's keep it 1000. Sukihana's image and others like her are not ones that warrant protection.
While Destiny Henderson (her government name) may deserve personal protection. The Sukihana with the Good Pussy “brand”, characterized by self-degradation and a demand for acceptance and compliance, does not warrant the same level of protection. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that the behavior she promotes can incite base instincts in men, emphasizing the critical importance of consent. Therefore, it becomes imperative to advocate for representation that avoids degradation and upholds dignity.
In conclusion, it is vital to recognize that Sukihana did not consent to the situation she experienced. However, we must address the issue of perpetuating lower natures that exist in some men. We need to stop objectifying ourselves and then being surprised by the consequences. I am fully aware that women who do not warrant sexual abuse do not bring it upon themselves, but we need to question why images like these, especially when they are so prevalent and prominent in our culture, contribute to the manifestation of lower nature in our society. How do they align with the behavior we approve of?
This discussion serves as a powerful reminder of the need to support and promote representation that prioritizes dignity and respect for all individuals. With that said, one individual must be cancelled, and the other should be arrested. I said what I said.
Please feel free to share this link with anyone you believe would benefit from gaining an unbiased perspective.
Peace & love ya’ll.
